+1 from me
I read this demand even months ago. I never found any response from Mr Lichess, though. Maybe there are good reasons not to split the classical in 2 categories, but I do not see them yet. I should really like it, too.
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/adding-rapid-and-slow-rating-categories---please-vote-?page=7#66 was an old thread that i digged up. great idea +1
Thanks, for that thread, EvilChess made an excellent topic, and he also created a cool voting pool for it: http://www.strawpoll.me/11093155
So come on guys, please vote!
So come on guys, please vote!
+1 for sure; there is currently no difference between a 8+0 game and a 180+180 game.
I'm perfectly agree with this proposition !
Makes sense.
+1 from me too. Prefer 30 minimum for games
I agree, and actually posted almost the same request yesterday, though it was at 'General Discussion'. I thank RMario for bringing me here. It was my very first posting in this forum and I didn't realized that here is the right place for that.
There you can find nice contributions on this issue as well. After all what I read, I think that a 15 0 time control would be both stay on the current general conditions of the tournments (i.e., during 2:30 hours you will play at least 5 games), and on the other hand it allows you more time to find your best move.
There you can find nice contributions on this issue as well. After all what I read, I think that a 15 0 time control would be both stay on the current general conditions of the tournments (i.e., during 2:30 hours you will play at least 5 games), and on the other hand it allows you more time to find your best move.
My point was indeed a bit different: I asked for TOURNMENTS with longer time control: lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/new-time-control-for-tournments-15-0
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.