Analysing the game against Carlsen, he suggested 12 ... h6, 13 Qh4??, with the bishop hanging! He literally said "after h6, Qh4 might be a move here". And he didn't realize the mistake until they turned on the engine, showing that it is minus 6!!!
Again, after the game against Alireza, he hugely misevaluated the positions, suggesting terribile lines like 20 ... g5, 21 h4 where white loses immediately. I've never listen to such a poor analysis by a GM. He tried to compensate his lack of calculation by saying: "I don't need to show variations", "this is just pure domination" "Come on, I wasn't the one holding", "I don't see a universe where this is holdable (when engine says minus 0.3)". Imagine Alireza, Esipenko or the young indians analysing like this. This is not analysis. This is the raving inflated ego of a cheater.
Again, after the game against Alireza, he hugely misevaluated the positions, suggesting terribile lines like 20 ... g5, 21 h4 where white loses immediately. I've never listen to such a poor analysis by a GM. He tried to compensate his lack of calculation by saying: "I don't need to show variations", "this is just pure domination" "Come on, I wasn't the one holding", "I don't see a universe where this is holdable (when engine says minus 0.3)". Imagine Alireza, Esipenko or the young indians analysing like this. This is not analysis. This is the raving inflated ego of a cheater.