yet more proof that positional play is the ticket to classical chess? I think so and thank you, good stuff.
@Hirogen said in #9:
> One stat that would be interesting to see is: very good positions vs points scored from those.
>
> My impression was that Vidit could have scored much better had he taken the chances he was given.
You were exactly right.
> One stat that would be interesting to see is: very good positions vs points scored from those.
>
> My impression was that Vidit could have scored much better had he taken the chances he was given.
You were exactly right.
Can anyone explain the accuracy graphs please? I dont quite get the x and y axes.
@Hegens said in #13:
> Can anyone explain the accuracy graphs please? I dont quite get the x and y axes.
The x-axis shows the accuracy, so it goes from 100 (the best move) to 0. The y-axis shows the number of moves played with each accuracy.
> Can anyone explain the accuracy graphs please? I dont quite get the x and y axes.
The x-axis shows the accuracy, so it goes from 100 (the best move) to 0. The y-axis shows the number of moves played with each accuracy.
Alireza had rough tournament
XD GUCKESH
Very nice. Benchmark for how to look at tournament/match player performance.
Those are very interesting plots!
What about to gather more insights and then procede with ML previsions (for example if we know the performance of each player and the other variables like -color, opponent, place of the tournament, ecc) maybe a Machine-Learning model can create more insights and previsions..!
What about to gather more insights and then procede with ML previsions (for example if we know the performance of each player and the other variables like -color, opponent, place of the tournament, ecc) maybe a Machine-Learning model can create more insights and previsions..!
good explanation
Amazing keep the good work going